Columbia professor admits to regularly using heroin for “work-life” balance, says we ‘must legalize drugs’

NEW YORK, NY– A Columbia University professor has admitted to regularly using heroin to reportedly improve his “work-life balance.” 

Carl Hart is a professor of psychology and neuroscience and he chairs the psych department. In his book, Drug Use for Grown-Ups: Chasing Liberty in the Land of Fear, Hart opens up about his own recreational drug use. 

At 54, the married father of three has snorted small amounts of heroin for as many as 10 days in a row and enjoyed it mightily, even if he’s experienced mild withdrawal symptoms “12 to 16 hours after he last dose.”

The New York Post reported that as Hart sees it, the discomfort is a worthwhile trade-off. Pointing out that the experience leaves him “refreshed” and “prepared to face another day,” Hart writes in his book:

“There aren’t many things in life that I enjoy more than a few lines by the fireplace at the end of the day.”

Hart, who studies the effects of psychoactive drugs on humans, finds his sue of the narcotics to be:

“As rational as my alcohol use. Like vacation, sex, and the arts, heroin is one of those tools that I use to maintain my work-life balance.”

Reportedly, his reason for coming clean about doing opiates and the like is to advocate for decriminalizing possession of recreational drugs. According to the publisher of the book:

“The book makes the case that the demonization of drug use, not drugs themselves, has been a tremendous scourge on America, not least in reinforcing this country’s enduring structural racism.”

According to the Insider, Hart’s book is a research scientists’s love letter to drugs of all stripes and an argument for more even-handed drug policies across the United States. He told the Insider:

“This notion that people are not going to use drugs, that’s silly and adolescent. That’s what this book is about: being grown up.”

Hart also said that he hopes to see President Biden work toward federal regulation and licensing of the use of substances that are often described as neighborhood scourges. By his logic, if people are going to indulge, they should at least do it “safely.”

It’s not just heroin that keeps Hart centered. He said that he is also a fan of the effects brought on by MDMA (better known as Molly or ecstasy) and methamphetamine, a drug that according to the CDC, has caused the most overdose deaths in nearly half the country.

In describing MDMA, Hart recalled “intense feelings of pleasure, gratitude, and energy.” He said:

“When I’m rolling, I just want to breathe deeply and enjoy it. The simple act of breathing can be extremely pleasurable.”

Hart even found pleasure in snorting a version of so-called bath salts, a synthetic cathinone that’s been linked to disturbing behavior from barking to breaking into homes. Hart’s assessment of the drug? “Unequivocally wonderful.” 

In his book, he recalls the effects as being “euphoric, energetic, clearheaded, and highly social…niiiiiice.” The drug had such nice effects that he writes about wanting to take the drug ahead of some “awful required social event, such as an academic reception.”

According to the Post, a representative for Columbia has not yet returned their request for comment on Hart’s illegal drug use. And while recreational-drug enthusiasts may salute Hart, the medical and addiction community may find the professor’s utopian approach less than ideal.

According to the CDC, in 2018, nearly 15,000 people died from drug overdoses involving heroin in the United States. Some experts still maintain that even legalizing cannabis, the mildest of recreational drugs, poses dangers, including increased visits to emergency rooms.

Christian Hopfer, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Colorado School of Medicine says that marijuana can have serious health effects. He said:

“Smoke a couple times a day and marijuana will knock you off your memory. That is pretty certain. And there is no question that legalization has a normalizing effect on something that used to be against the law.”

While acknowledging in his book that “drug use is not for everybody,” Hart cites America’s founding documents and their promise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as “reasons” for having the choice to snort lines, smoke weed, and “expand one’s mind.” He said:

“You can live you life as you choose. And it’s nobody’s business, as long as you do not interfere with anybody else doing the same.”

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

Columbia professor: Cancel Rockefeller Center Christmas tree because ‘Toxic Relationship’ of ‘Nature and Capitalism’

November 29th, 2020

The following article contains editorial content written by a retired Chief of Police and current staff writer for Law Enforcement Today.

NEW YORK, NY – In a year where liberals are attempting to suck the fun out of everything from The Fourth of July to more recently Thanksgiving, we now present another loon, this time from the field of academia, although that should come as a surprise to nobody.

Breitbart notes a professor at Columbia University is suggesting the cancellation of the Rockefeller Center Christmas tree in Manhattan because it represents a “toxic relationship between nature and capitalism.”

Do you ever wonder why young people seem to be offended by everything? Here you go. People like this are teaching your kid in college. Scary.

In speaking of the Christmas tree, Columbia Professor Brian Kahn wrote in an op-ed:

“Its appearance was a metaphor for this year of pandemic, a slapdash coup attempt, and a general drubbing of American exceptionalism.”

Yeah, ok.

 Kahn is identified as a “journalist covering climate change.” His claim to fame? He apparently was “a ski bum across the western US.”


Kahn, who fits the very definition of a “tree hugger,” called the tradition of cutting down a tree and transporting it to downtown Manhattan, where it might be enjoyed by New Yorkers and tourists (when the city had tourists) alike, a “toxic” symbol of how nature is treated while adding that this year’s Norway Spruce “should be the last” if we want to see any “justice.”

Like a good liberal, Kahn wants to suck the life out of everything because he is no doubt an angry individual who, since he probably has no joy in his life, wants to remove joy from others. He cried:

“This year’s tree is also perfectly poised to reflect something more than our national mood: It reflects the toxic relationship we have with the natural world and the need to rapidly reverse course.

“If this year’s tree sees any justice, it’s that it should be the last.”

Kahn decried the tree being removed from its habitat and being transported to Manhattan, claiming that “everything about this tree tells a piece of the story of our past century-plus relationship with nature and extractive capitalism,” and that the tree lost its “dignity” when it was transported to the city. Pardon us, but we did not know trees had feelings.

Our apologies.

Kahn wrote:

“The tree is a Norway Spruce, which, as you can likely guess from the name, is not native to the U.S. That in and of itself reflects how upended our relationship with nature is.

“In its previous home, though, it had an iota of dignity lost completely once it was transported to Midtown Manhattan.”

Hopefully, the tree does not require psychological counseling. Perhaps Kahn can refer it to one of his colleagues at Columbia.

Not only is Kahn upset with the tree being removed, but he is also mortified that the town whence it came was itself previously an old-growth forest.

Do you want to join our private family of first responders and supporters?  Get unprecedented access to some of the most powerful stories that the media refuses to show you.  Proceeds get reinvested into having active, retired and wounded officers, their families and supporters tell more of these stories.  Click to check it out.

LET Unity

He wrote that the very process of cutting down the tree—including the rescue of an owl found within it—reflected how “we’ve subjugated nature to our whims.”

Kahn whined:

“The Rockefeller tree was cut down in a town itself carved out of what was, more than a century ago, an old-growth forest. And an owl was scooped up in the process of cutting down the tree and transported to New York.

“All this reflects the ways in which we’ve subjugated nature to our whims. And really, the evolution of the Rockefeller Center tree tradition is a very apt stand-in for that.”

Kahn switched to the owl. He spoke of how the owl was symbolic “of our toxic relationship with nature.” 

He noted that that specific owl is not considered an endangered species currently, however, he said, “the climate crisis fueled by unending growth and fossil fuels will eventually come for it too.”

Kahn, who must be partially psychic, also acknowledged that he would more than likely be referred to as a “tree hugger,” and a “total killjoy” for his words.

Well, we nailed tree hugger but missed the part about a total killjoy. We apologize.

Kahn wrote:

“I know I’ll likely receive many furious emails cussing me out for being a tree hugger perpetrating the war on Christmas and a total killjoy.

“But my point isn’t that we should end joy and piss on Santa. It’s that now is the perfect moment to consider what we truly value.

“When I saw the Rockefeller Center tree propped up as it shed entire boughs to the cold plaza ground this year, I felt no elation.

“I just felt sad that we venerate the continued subjugation of nature at the expense of unfettered growth and consumption—or even simply because we, like those who suffered through the Great Depression, want to feel something like normal again.”

Felt no elation? We would guess this guy does not get too excited or happy about much, especially since he found it necessary to write an ode to a tree.

Kahn believes the tree tradition is “an icon of American exceptionalism.” People like this typically hate America, which is evident from his comments.

Kahn continued spewing:

“Its story has humble roots in the Great Depression when workers building Rockefeller Center decorated a tree as a pick-me-up for a beleaguered city.”

Now he says it has “morphed into a made-for-TV spectacle to sell ads against and draw onlookers, wowed by a towering Norway spruce set at the center of the beating, concrete-and-steel heart of capitalism.”

God forbid.

Kahn’s take isn’t surprising. It is all part of the cancel culture, which has become a liberal tradition. Instead of celebrating our differences, liberals like to cancel anything they disagree with, be it a book, a television program, a speech, a person on Twitter, an actor, or a Christmas tree.

Face it, folks. They are coming for you. It may not be today. It may not be tomorrow, but they’re coming. We have already seen them attempt to cancel law enforcement because it is all that stands between them and being able to run roughshod over the country.

We have already seen them come after two of our most treasured and time-honored traditions—the 4th of July and Thanksgiving.

Lest you think they would not come after Christmas, think again. They have seen an opening with the coronavirus, and they will not waste the opportunity.

Want to make sure you never miss a story from Law Enforcement Today? With so much “stuff” happening in the world on social media, it’s easy for things to get lost.

Make sure you click “following” and then click “see first” so you don’t miss a thing! (See image below.) Thanks for being a part of the LET family!

Facebook Follow First

Go to Source
Author: Jenna Curren

Author: admin

I'm awesome! What else would I say about myself.